Suburban ecosystem studies
Impacts of Leaf Litter Management On Insect Communities
Funding: NSF GRFP
People: Max Ferlauto
Autumn leaf litter management in suburbia is an understudied disturbance to overwintering insects. Litter removal may harm insect communities by directly removing organisms such as moths that overwinter in leaves or by stressing belowground communities by reducing the capacity of the soil to buffer temperatures. To test this, we removed or retained leaf litter from quadrats in twenty suburban properties in Maryland in December. We collected from emergence traps placed on these treatments every 10 days from March to July. Preliminary results show that removing leaf litter reduces moth emergence by up to 67 percent.
We are also using a large-scale tree biodiversity experiment (BiodiversiTREE) to assess if canopy diversity mitigates the effect of litter manipulation on overwintering insects. Here, we used two additional treatments (leaf mulching and leaf piles) to test the effects of common management techniques. Preliminary results show that litter removal and mulching cuts the number of emerging moths almost in half. We did not find an effect of tree diversity, but we are still processing data.
Impacts of Leaf Litter Management and tree diversity on nutrient cycling and decomposition
People: Max Ferlauto and Lauren Schmitt
Suburban yards represent a significant proportion of land and yard management can have substantial impacts on ecosystem function. Leaf litter management, such as raking fallen leaves, can influence decomposition and nutrient cycling. We used a teabag methodology to assess the variation in decomposition in Maryland yards to compare impacts of present and past litter manipulations.
After a three month period, legacy treatments – how litter had been managed over prior years– altered decomposition rates, but there was little impact from present year litter treatments.
At BiodiversiTREE, we manipulated leaf litter in treatments of “removal”, “mulch/shred”, and addition/piles for three years. We will use a similar teabag methodology this year to compare treatments but also use the design of the long-term experiment to ask questions about how canopy tree diversity interacts with litter management.
Insect Behaviors and life cycles in urban areas
People: Lauren Schmitt
There are many ways in which urban environments might alter insect behavior, but there is very little research exploring how this is or isn’t actually happening. We highlighted existing research and the key research gaps in a review published in Current Opinions in Insect Science. One figure from the paper is included here and described below:
Insect herbivore behaviors (a) are key to the successful completion of insect life cycles within both natural and urbanized habitats. Urbanized environmental conditions (b) likely alter many aspects of these habitats. Herbivore-specific attributes of life cycles include (1) the length of time spent in each life stage (2) the location in the urban environment where that life stage is spent (e.g. leaf, bark, soil surface), and (3) the seasonal timing of each stage. The latter is crucial for determining which stages are spent either overwintering or in aestivation. The life-cycle structure of a species determines which urbanized conditions the species is most likely to come in contact with. For example, species that overwinter in a rolled up leaf on the soil surface (such as the luna moth, Actias luna [Linneaus 1758], illustrated here) are more likely to be negatively affected by fall leaf removal or shredding in urbanized areas. Therefore, conspecifics living in different environments along a gradient of urbanization may experience different selective pressures on the same basic life cycle structure and behaviors. While global change intensity will generally increase along this gradient, management occurs in different forms in the vast majority, if not all, environments. Important insect herbivore behaviors (a) include: host-finding, feeding, oviposition/egg placement, pupation, and anti-predator defense. The primary life stages associated with each behavior are noted in parentheses (A = adult, L = larva, P = pupa).
We also organized a symposium at the 2022 Eastern Branch Entomological Meeting to synthesize research being done on insect conservation in urban areas and highlight non-pest, non-pollinator urban insect ecology.
the role of native plants in supporting biodiversity
People: Karin Burghardt
My undergraduate thesis work investigated the influence of suburban landscaping plants (conventional vs. native) on butterfly and bird abundance and biodiversity. We found that yards landscaped with native plants supported a greater diversity and abundance of birds and Lepidoptera larvae than did conventionally landscaped yards. This effect was driven by differences in insectivorous bird species and included a number of bird species of conservation concern. This research was reported in Conservation Biology.
Native vs. non-native plants -- an insect's perspective
We studied the abundance and diversity of insect species supported by 56 native and non-native tree species in four large scale common gardens designed to simulate a suburban yard. While non-native plants consistently supported fewer and less diverse insect communities, the effect is most pronounced for non-native plants without a local native congener (eg. a relative in the same genus).
Read more in our publications in Ecology Letters (beta diversity), Diversity and Distributions (diversity and abundance of all herbivorous insect species) and Ecosphere (caterpillars- with a focus on specialists vs. generalists), or check out my collaborator Doug Tallamy's book.